If you cannot see the graphics for this invitation please click here.

Spring 2008 Series

 

Elements of Seismic Data Processing

Wendy Ohlhauser

March 4 or 6

more info

 

Migration: Time or Depth? Kirchhoff or Wave Equation?

Jianhua Pan

March 11 or 13

more info

 

How can seismic attributes aid the geophysicist in making accurate interpretations?

Satinder Chopra

March 18 or 20

more info

 

Reliable density inversion and application in mapping reservoir heterogeneity for heavy oil in WCSB

Yong Xu

April 8 or 10

more info

 

Spectral decomposition applications and thin-bed reflectivity inversion

Satinder Chopra

April 15 or 17

 

Rock Properties & AVO analysis

Yong Xu

April 22 or 24

more info

 

Seismic Operations 101

Brad Torry

April 29

more info

 

Seismic Data Marketing

Brad Torry

May 1

more info

 

To RSVP for any of the above seminars,

click here.

 

For more information contact Florence Janzen at 781.1437

 

www.arcis.com

Lunch and Learn Seminars
Spring 2008

 

*UPDATED WITH NEW EXAMPLES*

Spectral decomposition applications and thin-bed reflectivity inversion

 

Presented by Satinder Chopra

April 15th or April 17th, 2008

11:55 to 1 pm (lunch provided)

Suite 2600, 111 - 5th Ave SW

East Petro-Canada Tower

 

Limited seating, click here to RSVP

 

This is the fifth in a series of lunch & learn seminars, see the sidebar for information on the other topics.

 

Spectral decomposition of seismic traces has existed since the earliest days of seismology.  A new paradigm in the use of spectral information has developed over the last five years beginning with the pioneering work of Greg Partyka, Kurt Marfurt and others at Amoco Research. A fundamental change in thinking has resulted from workstation technology that has allowed the rapid computation and visualization of Fourier spectra calculated with small windows as a continuous attribute.  Such spectra are dominated by local reflectivity patterns.  Anomalous geological features such as channels and hydrocarbon-filled reservoirs can have anomalous frequency responses.  Thus, visualizing the data at discrete frequencies may reveal anomalous or diagnostic behavior not readily apparent on the broad-band seismic data. Recently, wavelet transform techniques have been used to reveal spectral characteristics of individual composite reflections. A number of examples will be shown during the seminar to illustrate differences in frequency response of composite reflections caused by thin hydrocarbon reservoirs.  It is interesting to note that for thin reservoirs, seismic attenuation is a secondary effect, and frequency spectra are dominated by the reflectivity spectra. The result is that low impedance gas reservoirs often have anomalously high peak frequencies that can be used as a diagnostic hydrocarbon indicator.

 

Enhancing the frequency bandwidth of surface seismic data has always been a quest for geophysicists.  In fact, seismic resolution is the key to extraction of stratigraphic detail from seismic data and this has become more important over the last decade or so.  Seismic resolution refers to both the vertical and horizontal resolution. While both aspects are important for interpreting small features on seismic data, here, we focus our attention to the vertical resolution, recognizing that migration procedures are usually put in place for collapsing the Fresnel zones that enhance spatial resolution.

 

If the average spectrum of a seismic wavelet is centered around 30Hz, which is usually the case, reservoirs having a thickness less than 25 m, may not have top and base reflectors resolved.  Stratigraphic targets are usually set to look for reservoirs 10 m or less in thickness.  Attempts to achieve such objectives often lead to frequency enhancement procedures to be followed on surface seismic data.

 

Seismic sections are expected to bear a striking resemblance to geological cross-sections. When this happens, interpretation becomes straight-forward. If this does not happen, seismic interpreters resort to the art of geological interpretation of the seismic data based on their knowledge of the basic principles of geology and geophysics and their experience. In the practical scenario a certain amount of imagination is relied on when the bandwidth of the data is not supportive of the interpretation. Thin-bed reflectivity inversion helps the seismic interpreters by narrowing the gap between the two extremes mentioned above.

 

The highly resolved seismic data retrieved in the form of reflectivity data is not only very useful for making accurate interpretations but proves to be advantageous in many ways, two of which can be stated as:  (1) convolving the extracted reflectivity with a band pass wavelet of say 5-120 Hz provides a high frequency section yielding more information to the seismic interpreter, (2) attributes derived from high-frequency data provide enhanced lateral resolution of the features that are of interest and need to be interpreted.

 

Examples will be shown that illustrate such applications.

 

To learn more, attend the lunch & learn session on April 15th or 17th. Click here to RSVP.

 

This course is available as a free in-house seminar. For more information contact Florence Janzen, 781-1437 or email fjanzen@arcis.com.